Introduction

The Chinese developer community has pushed for native OpenClaw integrations with domestic messaging platforms: WeChat, DingTalk, and Feishu (Lark). These are essential for OpenClaw to become the "de facto" workplace assistant in China. While US users favor Slack and WhatsApp, the agentic economy in China scales through these domestic "super-apps." Without them, OpenClaw is a Western tool with limited relevance in the world's largest AI market. With them, it's a global platform. See messaging apps for the full channel landscape.

This post covers the platforms, current status, integration challenges, and why China messaging support matters for OpenClaw's future.

Platforms

  • WeChat: Dominant in China for personal and work communication. 1B+ users. WeChat Work (企业微信) is the enterprise variant. Most Chinese professionals live in WeChat. An agent that doesn't integrate with WeChat is invisible to them.
  • DingTalk (钉钉): Alibaba's enterprise messaging and collaboration platform. China's Slack equivalent. Widely used in Chinese businesses for internal communication, approvals, and workflows. Essential for B2B agent deployments.
  • Feishu (飞书) / Lark: ByteDance's collaboration platform. Popular in tech companies and startups. Strong in document collaboration, project management, and automation. Competes with DingTalk for enterprise adoption.

Current Status

Official OpenClaw supports: Telegram, WhatsApp, Slack, Discord, Signal, iMessage. WeChat, DingTalk, and Feishu are on the roadmap. Community forks provide experimental WeChat support — typically using unofficial APIs or workarounds. API access for these platforms can be complex: WeChat requires a business account and approval process; DingTalk and Feishu have developer programs but documentation and approval vary. The Foundation is prioritizing these integrations; timeline depends on resource allocation and API access.

Why It Matters

China is a massive market for agentic AI. DeepSeek, Kimi (Moonshot), GLM, and others offer competitive Chinese-language models. The infrastructure is there. The demand is there. Without WeChat/DingTalk/Feishu, OpenClaw is limited to expats and English-focused users in China. Native integration unlocks the domestic market. Kimi Claw (Moonshot) already offers WeChat integration — OpenClaw must follow or cede the market. Global reach means China. China means these platforms.

Integration Challenges

WeChat: requires WeChat Official Account or WeChat Work. Approval process. Rate limits. Template messages for certain use cases. DingTalk: has an open API; documentation is in Chinese. Feishu: similar — API exists, adoption requires localization. All three have different auth flows, message formats, and restrictions. Building and maintaining three integrations is non-trivial. Community efforts help; official support would accelerate adoption.

Competitive Landscape

Kimi Claw (Moonshot) has WeChat support. Other Chinese agent frameworks are emerging. OpenClaw's open-source, local-first model is a differentiator — but only if users can access it through their preferred channels. The first mover in China messaging may capture significant adoption. The Foundation's roadmap reflects this priority. See Kimi Claw for the competitive context.

Wrapping Up

China messaging support is critical for OpenClaw's global reach. WeChat, DingTalk, Feishu — these are the channels that matter in China. The roadmap includes them. Community is pushing. The question is when. See Chinese models and Kimi Claw for context. When these integrations ship, OpenClaw's addressable market expands dramatically.